The unambiguity of active voice is a useful tool to do so. Because the purpose of scientific texts is to transfer knowledge and ideas to an audience, it is valuable to write it down in such a way that it cannot be interpreted incorrectly, or out of context. In contrast, active voice is more concise and unambiguous it appropriately describes science, which is actively performed by scientists. In texts where you present your own results next to cited results from other scientists, passive voice may confuse your audience as it could be unclear whose results you are actually discussing. Sometimes, passive voice is conceived as more objective, but sentences using passive voice are also lengthier, impersonal, and may be perceived as boring. Traditionally, scientific texts relied on the use of passive voice however, there has been a more recent shift towards active voice use in scientific publications. highlighting the subject (we) simultaneously to the action and object. In active voice, the sentence would be: “ We measured the orientation of slickensides in three locations”, i.e. For example, one might choose to say, passively: “The orientation of slickensides was measured in three locations”, in which the emphasis lies on the object (the slickensides) and the action (was measured). Active voice is defined by a subject taking action upon an object. the verb) of an object rather than the subject in a sentence. Passive voice generally focuses more on the action ( i.e. The use of either passive or active voice in scientific writing often depends on the style and goal of the text.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |